Reply to: Mucosal histopathology in celiac disease: a rebuttal of Oberhuber´s subdivision of Marsh III
نویسندگان
چکیده
We read with interest the paper entitled “Mucosal histopathology in celiac disease: a rebuttal of Oberhuber ́s sub-division of Marsh III” by MN Marsh et al. published in this Journal (1). We have proposed a standardized classification system of the celiac lesions in 1999 (2).In their paper Marsh et al. comment on this work. To our surprise, the authors of the paper suggest that the flat mucosa (type IIIc in the modified Marsh classification) is the only acceptable and a provable stage of the destructive type of a CD lesion. According to their opinion, stages IIIa and b do not exist. They support their notion by comparing the scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of two IIIc lesions in fig. 2 and 3 accompanied by the corresponding conventional histological picture. In fig. 3 they demonstrate a section that could be mistaken for a “villous” projection as depicted in their figure legend. In our opinion only an inexperienced histopathologist would classify this lesion as IIIb. In fig. 6 they furthermore demonstrate that the severity of mucosal atrophy could be underestimated in histological sections passing through a collared basin. Unfortunately they only presented a cartoon to elucidate this type of error. We doubt that they are able to demonstrate such a lesion on histological sections. Furthermore, they ignore the fact that the interpretation of histological lesions in biopsies is performed on serial sections. Serial sections help to avoid this type of error.. Marsh and his team did not demonstrate the SEM of a histological lesion that could be clearly classified as type IIIa or b in the conventional histology. In our opinion such an attempt would have lead to a dismissal of their proposal. Furthermore, the authors were also prey to an error in their conception they suggest that an early lesion without villous flattening (type I or II lesion) turns into a flat mucosa without intermediary stages. Therefore, the villi would show a normal shape in the type I or II lesions, and then immediately become flat. We do not think that this is possible.
منابع مشابه
Mucosal histopathology in celiac disease: a rebuttal of Oberhuber’s sub-division of Marsh III
Individuals with particular genetic backgrounds develop immune responses to wheat proteins and become 'gluten-sensitised'. Mucosal pathology arises through activated mucosal T lymphocytes, resulting in a graded, adverse reaction between particular genes and wheat proteins. Given these varied influences, the Marsh Classification broadly itemises those stages through which a normal mucosa (Marsh ...
متن کاملWhat is the best histopathological classification for celiac disease? Does it matter?
The rebuttal of Oberhuber’s sub-division of Marsh III type in celiac disease (1) and its subsequent correspondence in the past and present issues of GHFBB allow us to review the current thinking on the histopathological classification of celiac disease. In the Definition of Medicine, Avicenna argues: -“While some divide medicine into a theoretical and a practical [applied] science, others may a...
متن کاملClinical and Laboratory Surveys of the Iranian Celiac Patients
Background and Objectives: As an autoimmune disease, celiac is triggered by exposure to dietary gluten in genetically susceptible individuals, leading to various gastrointestinal and non-gastrointestinal symptoms. The aim of the current study was to accurately investigate epidemiology of the celiac disease in Hamadan Province, Iran. Materials and Methods: This study was carried out as a case s...
متن کاملThe Value of Ensari's Proposal in Evaluating the Mucosal Pathology of Childhood Celiac Disease: Old Classification versus New Version.
OBJECTIVE Small intestinal biopsy remains the gold standard in diagnosing celiac disease (CD); however, the wide spectrum of histopathological states and differential diagnosis of CD is still a diagnostic problem for pathologists. Recently, Ensari reviewed the literature and proposed an update of the histopathological diagnosis and classification for CD. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this study, t...
متن کاملOberhuber versus Marsh: much ado about nothing?
This issue of the journal features a spirited debate between Oberhuber and Marsh et al regarding the existence and significance of Oberhuber’s sub-classification of the Marsh III lesion into III a, b, c categories. The controversy stems from an article by Marsh and colleagues in an earlier issue of this journal where they present scanning electron microscopic (SEM) images from two cases classif...
متن کامل